Wut? You literally explained the incentive in the first point. Bitcoin only solves the money problem. We have other problems besides being able to save and transact, obviously. The reflexive hate for using these technologies to improve user experience in a variety of circumstances outside of money is retarded.

I see at least too reasons why this isn't such a great idea. 1. As the real world assets don't reside on the chain, you need to trust someone who says the assets are there and there are only as much of them as claimed. 2. There's no incentive to run a decentralized blockchain for this just like for all use cases besides money. Just do it more efficiently and use a database, only bring the UX to 21st century.

Fake news from Giacomo, anyone that paid any attention knows he wasn’t saying “there’s no second best” because he thought the government would crack down on other cryptocurrencies. There’s nothing inherently wrong or immoral ablutions tokenizing things like shares, tickets, etc. Most bitcoiners just have PTSD from the bad application of technology, so they have a knee jerk reaction at everything looking to solve a problem that Bitcoin can’t for obvious reasons

I think nostr:nprofile1qyvhwumn8ghj7ctyw4k8gt338pcxcatn9eek7cmfv9kqz9nhwden5te0v96xcctn9ehx7um5wghxcctwvsqzpmc4r3arsr6q5awh69yn4s68kemh48vmt7s250xak3lu0ratdx5tz27l4q has the best take

Andreas needed cash. Fine. What's Saylor's excuse? 🤦‍♂️

This whole talk today was a complete trainwreck, but I'm posting a few minutes of it to show how bad it was. https://blossom.primal.net/22fd2437515449aa3e7e68f3bb0021ae583450b28da0db93bf6a5cc8e3bc7b7d.mov