Mathematically incomprehensible 😂

Imagine intervals would depend on timezone. Your flight takes 3 hours, but you enter another timezone that is earlier, so your flight suddenly takes more. 😂

That’s not how minutes and intervals work, remove Dev prefix from your username, you are embarrassing the rest of us 🤣😂🤣😭

Finished, for those who cannot perform basic time calculations nostr:note1rgdm9gun3m09kfkcjp5g3s3ayvm6qf5rlck46r6zlv9a996ljfsq4ldr77

See my other notes

Today I was able to prove a point to myself. Enraging people sells more than endearing them. This is not healthy, we should all get help and stop this nonsense. 🫂🫡

Need content creation tools and vastly different social experiences

But content is a chicken and egg problem. Somehow I think, that you can only move people if you understand their current issue, and make it costly for them to not change.

I would look at it from the jobs to be done framework. What job do you want your client to perform? Is it doing a good job of that? Some jobs: entertainment, education, passing of time, humor, news. If you ask me, I'd say nostr fails on all fronts for the general public because we lack the variety of content that engages. Now, it does work for some people, like me, and bitcoiners mainly. So if you're building a client, focus on what you want it to be good at, and do it in an innovative manner. Simply copying an incumbent wont work because they have way more creators and highly refined engagement methods they've been testing for a decade. Biggest evidence of this being the case is people who joined and stayed around for over a year and left. If you ask them, they'll probably say something something echo chamber, got bored.

Saturday night launch. 🚀 Nostr's UX problem isn't a secret. 30-day retention trends to 0%. Daily active users stuck at ~10k. Posts disappear. Followers vanish when you switch apps. Every app feels like beta software. I've spent 2+ years arguing that great UX wins. So I designed a meta-study, threw a few hundred dollars at Claude, and put together what the evidence indicates. tl;dr: Ship working experiences, then add features. 🔗 https://nostr-ux.com 6 critical patterns backed by 100+ citations: ‣ Onboarding, content discovery, core interactions ‣ Performance, progressive complexity, cross-client consistency ‣ Anti-patterns to avoid + validation checklists I'm not a designer, but I know what good looks like. This is opinionated, evidence-based, and focused on retention. What am I missing? What did I get wrong? Send PRs this way: https://github.com/shawnyeager/nostr-ux-research cc: nostr:nprofile1qyxhwumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmvqyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqpqr0rs5q2gk0e3dk3nlc7gnu378ec6cnlenqp8a3cjhyzu6f8k5sgsy67l5w nostr:nprofile1qy8hwumn8ghj7mn09eehgu3wvdeqzrthwden5te0dehhxtnvdakqqgqh2wxu9f38d8gfgsl33smuhc6cl26mh7vpzu6592nutlchrmthcsdtdqz4 nostr:nprofile1qydhwumn8ghj7cmgwfhku6trd3jjuer5dahx7m3wvdhk6tcpr9mhxue69uhkcctwvuh8yetvv9uhxtnvv9hxgtmfwsqzq77777lz9hvwt86xqrsyf2jn588ewk5aclf8mavr80rhmduy5kq92xkt0h