can't figure out how to extend it tho. but i'll renew it later anyway

should just make blossom.nostr.build subdomain and nobody will be confused. i think #jumble actually says it's nostr.build but that's the only place i think i've seen the two domains next to each other

it might help to make it more clear that blossom.band is nostr.build property. also, on the page there is no simple way to just copy the link to paste into a client config

or maybe this gets a preview https://a.nostr.build/vm7a.mp3

proof:

that didn't work either. my npub is broked

well, that's awesome but i was fine with paying, i just want to use the blossom

haha what a farce. literally i have to make a new npub to use nostr.build now, i can't even use it if want to, can't even pay to use it. i hope this is all because it's not making money. maybe raise the price? lol. i'll stick to text on nostr i think

what android version is that? i have android 13 and that power usage controls stuff is more detailed

is this a social graph flattened out to 2d? nostr:npub176p7sup477k5738qhxx0hk2n0cty2k5je5uvalzvkvwmw4tltmeqw7vgup you seen this stuff?

a flurry of discussions and things relating to my work lately have led me to something there is two current existing query types in nostr, the REQ and the COUNT REQ has no concrete notion of signalling how many events there are in a request beyond what it has been hard coded to limit results to COUNT doesn't have metadata to easily determine other than making multiple COUNT queries "since" and "until" fields in filters can be used to create a boundary that limits the number of results from a REQ but it is inadequate i could swear i already made this suggestion before but i'm gonna make it again, if i did, or for the first time if not there should be a query that just spits back a list of all the event IDs that match a query, and if you set no limit, it just returns the whole set if you consider that some follow events take as much as 512kb of data, and this is often a common size limit for individual events, then this is good for somewhere around 14000 individual event IDs to be returned in a result, it could be as simple as an array, so overhead is ["<hash>",...] perhaps this is not sufficient though, maybe you want to include the timestamp next to each event ID... or maybe you could make it so you define the first timestamp of the first event ID, and then after that it's seconds offsets from the previous, this would mean that the list would be something like [[12345678,"<id>"],[1234,"<id2>"],[2562,"<id3>"], ... ] i'm inclined to say that fuck the datestamps, i'm just gonna make a new req variant that returns the IDs instead of the results as an array, and to keep with the style, it will just be ["REQID","subscriptionID","<id1>","<id2>", ... ] the relay already can specify some size limit according to the nip-11 relay information, so it can just stop at just before that size limit and the user can query for that event and get a timestamp "since" to use to get the rest nostr:npub1ntlexmuxr9q3cp5ju9xh4t6fu3w0myyw32w84lfuw2nyhgxu407qf0m38t what do you think about this idea? if the query has sufficient reasonable bounds, like, it is very unlikely you want more than 14000 events over a period of let's say, the last day, of a specific kind, and certainly not if you limit it to some set of npubs but you would still know where the results end, and so long as you stick to the invariant of "this is what i have on hand right now" the question of propagating queries can be capped by the answer of "what i have" and it is implementation internal whether or not you have a second layer and if you then go and cache the results of that query so next time you can send a more complete list and i am not even considering this option what about if instead of returning the results encoded in hex (50% versus binary hash size) but instead send them as base64 encoded versions of the event IDs, that gives you 75% or in other words expands the hypothetical max results of just IDs from 14000 to 21000

insurance is a part of the fiat monetary complex though, it's fractional saving, basically... no guarantee you'll ever get back what you put in but you can also get back a lot more than what you put in i would call that gambling

are those duck eggs? the yolk is super reddish

if i'm logged in, and i pull the entire body of content on the page, and scrape it for the link text prefix, i can get this list you are talking nonsense, there is code already in the item view that does this, albeit progressively, you just need to pluck that piece out and remove the pagination and attach the action to a button what will take hours - probably days - is writing a script that does nip-07 auth without being in a web browser